This is why DPS is the most significant quality for measuring damage output. The first player was about 11% more effective.

Even though they dealt more damage, they had more time available, and were not as efficient during the time the battle took. On another day, another player might deal 320,000 damage, but take 6 minutes (360 seconds) to do it. Since different factors can influence how long the battle takes, such as how well the other players in the battle are doing, it is not fair to simply compare a raw amount of damage. If a player deals 300,000 damage to a boss during 5 minutes (300 seconds), then they would be averaging 1000 damage-per-second.

(Min Damage + Max Damage) / (2 * attack speed)Ī character's DPS is defined as the amount of damage they deal across a certain amount of time. Damage per second for a weapon can be computed as: The DPS on a weapon is found from those other two statistics, but it is the single easiest way for determining if a weapon is more potent than another. This is why every weapon in World of Warcraft has not only the damage range on it and the attack speed, but also the damage per second. There's some exact amount of damage you want to deal to ultimately kill a target, but to reduce the time it takes (so you kill it before it kills you,) you need to increase the rate at which the damage is being dealt.

Physics tells us that 'work equals rate times time.' If the work that characters in battle do is damage, then that means damage = rate * time. But who will deal more damage over time? This is where DPS figures in. Who is going to hit harder? Who is going to hit more frequently? Obviously the paladin, and the rogue, in that order. Imagine a rogue with a pair of small daggers. Imagine a paladin with a two-handed weapon.

How much damage should i be doing wow